This development in her character culminates in the Devi Gita. The author of the Devi Gita is indebted to the Bhagavad Gita for many of its themes and motifs.
- Broken Consciousness: Reflections of an Epileptic.
- London, A Very Peculiar History!
- Shopping Cart?
It is a philosophical and devotional poem in the form of a dialogue between the Goddess and her ardent devotee, the Mountain King Himalaya. In her highest iconic form as Bhuvaneshvari, the supreme World-Mother, the Goddess teaches compassion and gives insight. The ten chapters of the Devi Gita sing the superiority of the Goddess, and glorify and elaborate on her nature.
She is described as both horrific and benign, an enabling energy in all beings, and as the ultimate creative, organizing and destructive power in the universe. The Devi is an abstract power as well as one with an iconographic form.
Items Related to à¤¦à¥à¤µà¥à¤à¥à¤¤à¤¾ (à¤¸à¤à¤¸à¥à¤à¥à¤¤ à¤à¤µà¤®à¥... (Hindu | Books)
She wholly transcends the universe and yet is embodied within all beings. As an abstraction she is Brahman and as a personal deity she is a vehicle for spiritual transformation. As far as I know the Devi Gita , not including its scriptural forerunners such as the Devi-Bhagavata Purana and the Devi Mahatmya is the only text in the world in which the Supreme Being is envisioned as female. The text presents a vision of the universe created, maintained and protected by all knowing and wholly compassionate World-Mother.
She is not subordinate to any God and is beyond being born, marriage or giving birth. In the Devi Gita , the human body is considered sacred and a powerful tool. Female body is not only to birth and nourish life but is also an instrument of personal and spiritual growth. Here the Devi is worshipped as the giver of both enjoyment and liberation. Materiality is not regarded as illusory but as a powerful expression of nonmaterial energies. As the universal cosmic energy the Devi is the psychophysical guiding force that resides within each individual.
When not having a dialogue with her devotees, the Devi resides in her celestial paradise, Manidvipa , the Jeweled Island situated at the peak of the universe. From this abode, fully awake, she observes the troubles of the world and intervenes if her devotees are in difficulty or danger. She rests on a sacred throne that symbolically reveals her supreme power.
It has four legs made up of the four gods: Brahma, Vishnu, Shiva and Agni. She sits on the stretched-out corpse of the Sadasiva-he is inert under her until aroused by her. Most of the world religions use masculine gender for the Supreme Reality.
The description of The Devi Gita
The said article is reproduced hereinunder for the benefit of all:. Patna High Court C. You are to state facts clearly; so that your thinking, or what you call knowing, a cause to be bad must be from reasoning, must be from supposing your arguments to be weak and inconclusive.
But Sir, that is not enough. An argument which does not convince yourself may convince the judge to whom you urge it; and if it does convince him, why then, sir, you are wrong and he is right. It is his business to judge; and you are not to be confident in your own opinion that a cause is bad, but to say all you can for your client, and then hear the judge's opinion.
- Andrews Fairy Tale?
- Download The Devi Gita Song Of The Goddess English Edition PDF, ePub, Mobi Book"!
- Gita Savitri Devi.
- Hanon for Guitar: Inside Out (Master the Classics! Book 3).
- Devi Bhagavata Purana – Vyasa Mahabharata?
- How Buddy Disappeared and What Happened to Him;
BOSWELL: But, Sir, does not affecting a warmth when you have no warmth, and appearing to be clearly of one opinion when you are in reality of another opinion, does not such dissimulation impair one's honesty? Is there not some danger that a lawyer may put on the same mask in common life in the intercourse with his fiends? Everybody knows you are paid for affecting warmth for your client, and it is therefore properly no dissimulation: the moment you come from the Bar you resume your usual behaviour.
Sir, a man will no more carry the artifice of the Bar into the common intercourse of society, than a man who is paid for tumbling upon his hands will continue to tumble on his hands when he should walk upon his feet. It is argued that what a lawyer says is not the expression of his own mind and opinion, but rather that of his client.
The Song of the Goddess: The Devi Gita: Spiritual Counsel of the Great Goddess
A lawyer has no right to state his own thoughts. He can only say what his client would have said for himself had he possessed the proper skill to represent himself. Since a client is deemed innocent until proved guilty, a lawyer's knowledge that his client is guilty does not make him so. The lawyer is indeed only the mouthpiece and prolocutor of his client, and the underworld, in their characteristically graphic manner, indeed call their lawyers the mouthpiece. It is well to remember that an advocate should never become a litigant, as it were, and must never inject his own thoughts and opinions into a case.
How can a lawyer, or any person for that matter, know whether a person is guilty before his guilt is established? A person charged with crime might be completely deprived of counsel.
„Devi Gita“ auf Apple Podcasts
For all the lawyers in the community might believe him guilty and wash their hands of him. How does such prejudgment of guilt differ from the lynch mob, which is equally so convinced of guilt that it Patna High Court C. True, to be strung up by the lynch mob without a trial may be somewhat more embarrassing to the victim than to submit to a trial without counsel, but, if defense counsel plays the important role which lawyers like to think he does, a person charged with crime is indeed in an unhappy position if he has to rely on his own knowledge of the law and wits to counter an experienced prosecutor bent on conviction and whose success is measured by his percentage of convictions.
On undertaking a client's cause, he must wipe out the villainy of the defendant with all the resources at his command.
Are not the facts that are unfavourable to his client to be left for the prosecution? If the lawyer may see the better way and approve not to foster claims that are wrong the circumstances that compel him, especially in criminal cases, to follow the lesser. Thus the lawyer lives with the maxim: "Video meliora proboque deteriora sequor. Such an attitude we submit entirely overlooks the bifurcated robes of a lawyer.
The duty is not simply one which he owes his client. Just as important is the duty which the lawyer owes the court and society. Great as is his loyalty to the client, even greater is his sacred obligation as an officer of the court. He cannot ethically, and should not by preference, present to the court assertions he knows to be false.
- Logic: Bullet Guides.
- Renuka devi photo?
- The Cambridge Companion to David Mamet (Cambridge Companions to Literature)?
- One Month of Passion.
- Navigation menu.
- From the manufacturer.
The office of attorney does not permit, much less does it demand of him for any client, violation of law or any manner of fraud or chicane. He must obey his own conscience and not that of his client. The lawyer must decline to conduct a civil cause or to make a defense when convinced that it is intended merely to harass or to injure the opposite party or to work oppression or wrong. His appearance in court should be deemed equivalent to an assertion on his honor that in his opinion his client's case is one proper for judicial determination.
The American Bar Association recommends this oath of admission:. I will not counsel or maintain any suit or proceeding which shall appear to me to be unjust, nor any defense except such as I believe to be honestly debatable under the law of the land;. I will employ for the purpose of maintaining the causes confided to me such means only as are consistent with truth and honor, and will never seek to mislead the judge or jury by any artifice or false statement of fact or law.
All our democratic safeguards are thrown about a person accused of a crime so that no innocent man may suffer.
Devi Gita Class
Guilty defendants, though they are entitled to be defended sincerely and hopefully, should not be entitled to the presentation of false testimony and insincere statements by counsel. It is too glibly said a lawyer should not judge his own client and that the court's province would thus be invaded. In more than 90 per cent of all criminal cases a lawyer knows when his client is guilty or not guilty.
The facts usually stand out with glaring and startling simplicity. If a lawyer knows his client to be guilty, it is his duty in such case to set out the extenuating facts and plead for mercy in which the lawyer sincerely believes. In the infrequent number of cases where there is doubt of the client's guilt and the lawyer sincerely believes his client is innocent, he of course should plead his client's cause to the best of his ability.
In civil cases, the area of doubt is undoubtedly considerably greater. At a guess, only one-third the cases presented to a lawyer are pure black or pure white. In only one-third of the cases does the lawyer indubitably know his client is wrong or right. In the other two-thirds gray is the predominant color. It is the duty of the advocate to appraise the client's cause in his favor, after giving due consideration to the facts on the other side. In such a case, it is of course the duty of the advocate to present his client's case to the best of his ability.